How P2PRadar's Weighted Rankings Work | P2PRadar

Last updated: 2026-08-29

Understand how P2PRadar ranks P2P platforms with weighted due diligence: the factors, weights, exclusions and capital-at-risk divider.

What the ranking means

Ranks 1–4 are fixed editorial placements. Their weighted DD score is visible but does not determine their order. From rank 5 onward, platforms are ordered by weighted due diligence, not headline yield.

The weighted due-diligence score

Trust & transparency — 35%

Regulatory status, ownership, disclosures, investor protections and how easy the structure is to verify.

Proven track record — 30%

The length and quality of live operating history, including how stress, defaults and recoveries were handled.

Operating maturity — 20%

How established the product, reporting, processes and underlying lending model are.

Governance & controversies — 15%

Communication and governance quality, plus material legal, liquidity, repayment or reputation issues.

What does not raise a score

  • High advertised returns, bonuses and signup promotions do not raise a score.
  • Affiliate status or commission does not raise a score.
  • A higher score is not capital protection and does not remove platform, borrower or liquidity risk.

Why rankings and the risk zone can change

Scores change when due-diligence inputs change. After rank 10, the capital-at-risk divider marks platforms where shorter or less-tested history, recovery or liquidity uncertainty, concentration or weaker governance materially increase loss risk. It is a speculative-risk warning, not a fraud label.

How to use the rankings correctly

Use rankings as a shortlist generator, then read the platform review or comparison article, inspect the cited sources, and cross-check the Affiliations & monetization. For broader context about how the site is run, see the About & Methodology.